1.1 --- a/en/mq.tex	Wed Aug 02 19:43:53 2006 -0700
     1.2 +++ b/en/mq.tex	Thu Oct 12 16:27:00 2006 -0700
     1.3 @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
     1.4  I cannot overstate the value that MQ offers through the unification of
     1.5  patches and revision control.
     1.6  
     1.7 -A major reaon that patches have persisted in the free software and
     1.8 +A major reason that patches have persisted in the free software and
     1.9  open source world---in spite of the availability of increasingly
    1.10  capable revision control tools over the years---is the \emph{agility}
    1.11  they offer.  
    1.12 @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@
    1.13  line.''  For example, a line that is modified is represented by one
    1.14  deletion and one insertion.
    1.15  
    1.16 -We will return to ome of the more subtle aspects of patches later (in
    1.17 +We will return to some of the more subtle aspects of patches later (in
    1.18  section~\ref{sec:mq:adv-patch}), but you should have enough information
    1.19  now to use MQ.
    1.20  
    1.21 @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@
    1.22  some performance experiments in mid-2006 for a talk that I gave at the
    1.23  2006 EuroPython conference~\cite{web:europython}.  I used as my data
    1.24  set the Linux 2.6.17-mm1 patch series, which consists of 1,738
    1.25 -patches.  I applied thes on top of a Linux kernel repository
    1.26 +patches.  I applied these on top of a Linux kernel repository
    1.27  containing all 27,472 revisions between Linux 2.6.12-rc2 and Linux
    1.28  2.6.17.
    1.29