1.1 --- a/en/intro.tex	Thu Aug 21 22:21:24 2008 +0200
     1.2 +++ b/en/intro.tex	Thu Aug 21 23:07:36 2008 -0400
     1.3 @@ -373,14 +373,6 @@
     1.4  learn to use the other.  Both tools are portable to all popular
     1.5  operating systems.
     1.6  
     1.7 -Subversion lacks a history-aware merge capability, forcing its users
     1.8 -to manually track exactly which revisions have been merged between
     1.9 -branches.  If users fail to do this, or make mistakes, they face the
    1.10 -prospect of manually resolving merges with unnecessary conflicts.
    1.11 -Subversion also fails to merge changes when files or directories are
    1.12 -renamed.  Subversion's poor merge support is its single biggest
    1.13 -weakness.
    1.14 -
    1.15  Mercurial has a substantial performance advantage over Subversion on
    1.16  every revision control operation I have benchmarked.  I have measured
    1.17  its advantage as ranging from a factor of two to a factor of six when