rev |
line source |
bos@95
|
1 \chapter{A tour of Mercurial: the basics}
|
bos@95
|
2 \label{chap:tour-basic}
|
bos@84
|
3
|
bos@84
|
4 \section{Installing Mercurial on your system}
|
bos@84
|
5 \label{sec:tour:install}
|
bos@84
|
6
|
bos@85
|
7 Prebuilt binary packages of Mercurial are available for every popular
|
bos@85
|
8 operating system. These make it easy to start using Mercurial on your
|
bos@85
|
9 computer immediately.
|
bos@85
|
10
|
bos@84
|
11 \subsection{Linux}
|
bos@84
|
12
|
bos@84
|
13 Because each Linux distribution has its own packaging tools, policies,
|
bos@84
|
14 and rate of development, it's difficult to give a comprehensive set of
|
bos@85
|
15 instructions on how to install Mercurial binaries. The version of
|
bos@85
|
16 Mercurial that you will end up with can vary depending on how active
|
bos@85
|
17 the person is who maintains the package for your distribution.
|
bos@84
|
18
|
bos@84
|
19 To keep things simple, I will focus on installing Mercurial from the
|
bos@84
|
20 command line under the most popular Linux distributions. Most of
|
bos@84
|
21 these distributions provide graphical package managers that will let
|
bos@84
|
22 you install Mercurial with a single click; the package name to look
|
bos@84
|
23 for is \texttt{mercurial}.
|
bos@84
|
24
|
bos@85
|
25 \begin{itemize}
|
bos@85
|
26 \item[Debian]
|
bos@85
|
27 \begin{codesample4}
|
bos@85
|
28 apt-get install mercurial
|
bos@85
|
29 \end{codesample4}
|
bos@84
|
30
|
bos@85
|
31 \item[Fedora Core]
|
bos@85
|
32 \begin{codesample4}
|
bos@85
|
33 yum install mercurial
|
bos@85
|
34 \end{codesample4}
|
bos@84
|
35
|
bos@85
|
36 \item[Gentoo]
|
bos@85
|
37 \begin{codesample4}
|
bos@85
|
38 emerge mercurial
|
bos@85
|
39 \end{codesample4}
|
bos@84
|
40
|
bos@85
|
41 \item[OpenSUSE]
|
bos@85
|
42 \begin{codesample4}
|
bos@85
|
43 yum install mercurial
|
bos@85
|
44 \end{codesample4}
|
bos@84
|
45
|
bos@85
|
46 \item[Ubuntu] Ubuntu's Mercurial package is particularly old, and you
|
bos@85
|
47 should not use it. If you know how, you can rebuild and install the
|
bos@85
|
48 Debian package. It's probably easier to build Mercurial from source
|
bos@85
|
49 and simply run that; see section~\ref{sec:srcinstall:unixlike} for
|
bos@85
|
50 details.
|
bos@85
|
51 \end{itemize}
|
bos@84
|
52
|
bos@84
|
53 \subsection{Mac OS X}
|
bos@84
|
54
|
bos@84
|
55 Lee Cantey publishes an installer of Mercurial for Mac OS~X at
|
bos@84
|
56 \url{http://mercurial.berkwood.com}. This package works on both
|
bos@85
|
57 Intel-~and Power-based Macs. Before you can use it, you must install
|
bos@85
|
58 a compatible version of Universal MacPython~\cite{web:macpython}. This
|
bos@85
|
59 is easy to do; simply follow the instructions on Lee's site.
|
bos@84
|
60
|
bos@84
|
61 \subsection{Solaris}
|
bos@84
|
62
|
bos@84
|
63 XXX.
|
bos@84
|
64
|
bos@84
|
65 \subsection{Windows}
|
bos@84
|
66
|
bos@84
|
67 Lee Cantey publishes an installer of Mercurial for Windows at
|
bos@84
|
68 \url{http://mercurial.berkwood.com}. This package has no external
|
bos@84
|
69 dependencies; it ``just works''.
|
bos@84
|
70
|
bos@84
|
71 \begin{note}
|
bos@84
|
72 The Windows version of Mercurial does not automatically convert line
|
bos@84
|
73 endings between Windows and Unix styles. If you want to share work
|
bos@84
|
74 with Unix users, you must do a little additional configuration
|
bos@84
|
75 work. XXX Flesh this out.
|
bos@84
|
76 \end{note}
|
bos@84
|
77
|
bos@87
|
78 \section{Getting started}
|
bos@87
|
79
|
bos@87
|
80 To begin, we'll use the \hgcmd{version} command to find out whether
|
bos@87
|
81 Mercurial is actually installed properly. The actual version
|
bos@87
|
82 information that it prints isn't so important; it's whether it prints
|
bos@87
|
83 anything at all that we care about.
|
bos@87
|
84 \interaction{tour.version}
|
bos@87
|
85
|
bos@87
|
86 \subsection{Built-in help}
|
bos@87
|
87
|
bos@87
|
88 Mercurial provides a built-in help system. This invaluable for those
|
bos@87
|
89 times when you find yourself stuck trying to remember how to run a
|
bos@87
|
90 command. If you are completely stuck, simply run \hgcmd{help}; it
|
bos@87
|
91 will print a brief list of commands, along with a description of what
|
bos@87
|
92 each does. If you ask for help on a specific command (as below), it
|
bos@87
|
93 prints more detailed information.
|
bos@87
|
94 \interaction{tour.help}
|
bos@87
|
95 For a more impressive level of detail (which you won't usually need)
|
bos@87
|
96 run \hgcmdargs{help}{\hggopt{-v}}. The \hggopt{-v} option is short
|
bos@87
|
97 for \hggopt{--verbose}, and tells Mercurial to print more information
|
bos@87
|
98 than it usually would.
|
bos@87
|
99
|
bos@87
|
100 \section{Working with a repository}
|
bos@87
|
101
|
bos@87
|
102 In Mercurial, everything happens inside a \emph{repository}. The
|
bos@87
|
103 repository for a project contains all of the files that ``belong to''
|
bos@87
|
104 that project, along with a historical record of the project's files.
|
bos@87
|
105
|
bos@87
|
106 There's nothing particularly magical about a repository; it is simply
|
bos@87
|
107 a directory tree in your filesystem that Mercurial treats as special.
|
bos@87
|
108 You can rename delete a repository any time you like, using either the
|
bos@87
|
109 command line or your file browser.
|
bos@87
|
110
|
bos@88
|
111 \subsection{Making a local copy of a repository}
|
bos@87
|
112
|
bos@87
|
113 \emph{Copying} a repository is just a little bit special. While you
|
bos@87
|
114 could use a normal file copying command to make a copy of a
|
bos@87
|
115 repository, it's best to use a built-in command that Mercurial
|
bos@87
|
116 provides. This command is called \hgcmd{clone}, because it creates an
|
bos@87
|
117 identical copy of an existing repository.
|
bos@87
|
118 \interaction{tour.clone}
|
bos@87
|
119 If our clone succeeded, we should now have a local directory called
|
bos@87
|
120 \dirname{hello}. This directory will contain some files.
|
bos@87
|
121 \interaction{tour.ls}
|
bos@87
|
122 These files have the same contents and history in our repository as
|
bos@87
|
123 they do in the repository we cloned.
|
bos@87
|
124
|
bos@87
|
125 Every Mercurial repository is complete, self-contained, and
|
bos@87
|
126 independent. It contains its own private copy of a project's files
|
bos@87
|
127 and history. A cloned repository remembers the location of the
|
bos@87
|
128 repository it was cloned from, but it does not communicate with that
|
bos@87
|
129 repository, or any other, unless you tell it to.
|
bos@87
|
130
|
bos@87
|
131 What this means for now is that we're free to experiment with our
|
bos@87
|
132 repository, safe in the knowledge that it's a private ``sandbox'' that
|
bos@87
|
133 won't affect anyone else.
|
bos@85
|
134
|
bos@88
|
135 \subsection{What's in a repository?}
|
bos@88
|
136
|
bos@88
|
137 When we take a more detailed look inside a repository, we can see that
|
bos@88
|
138 it contains a directory named \dirname{.hg}. This is where Mercurial
|
bos@88
|
139 keeps all of its metadata for the repository.
|
bos@88
|
140 \interaction{tour.ls-a}
|
bos@88
|
141
|
bos@88
|
142 The contents of the \dirname{.hg} directory and its subdirectories are
|
bos@88
|
143 private to Mercurial. Every other file and directory in the
|
bos@88
|
144 repository is yours to do with as you please.
|
bos@88
|
145
|
bos@88
|
146 To introduce a little terminology, the \dirname{.hg} directory is the
|
bos@88
|
147 ``real'' repository, and all of the files and directories that coexist
|
bos@91
|
148 with it are said to live in the \emph{working directory}. An easy way
|
bos@91
|
149 to remember the distinction is that the \emph{repository} contains the
|
bos@88
|
150 \emph{history} of your project, while the \emph{working directory}
|
bos@88
|
151 contains a \emph{snapshot} of your project at a particular point in
|
bos@88
|
152 history.
|
bos@88
|
153
|
bos@88
|
154 \section{A tour through history}
|
bos@88
|
155
|
bos@88
|
156 One of the first things we might want to do with a new, unfamiliar
|
bos@88
|
157 repository is understand its history. The \hgcmd{log} command gives
|
bos@88
|
158 us a view of history.
|
bos@88
|
159 \interaction{tour.log}
|
bos@88
|
160 By default, this command prints a brief paragraph of output for each
|
bos@88
|
161 change to the project that was recorded. In Mercurial terminology, we
|
bos@88
|
162 call each of these recorded events a \emph{changeset}, because it can
|
bos@88
|
163 contain a record of changes to several files.
|
bos@88
|
164
|
bos@88
|
165 The fields in a record of output from \hgcmd{log} are as follows.
|
bos@88
|
166 \begin{itemize}
|
bos@88
|
167 \item[\texttt{changeset}] This field has the format of a number,
|
bos@88
|
168 followed by a colon, followed by a hexadecimal string. These are
|
bos@88
|
169 \emph{identifiers} for the changeset. There are two identifiers
|
bos@88
|
170 because the number is shorter and easier to type than the hex
|
bos@88
|
171 string.
|
bos@88
|
172 \item[\texttt{user}] The identity of the person who created the
|
bos@88
|
173 changeset. This is a free-form field, but it most often contains a
|
bos@88
|
174 person's name and email address.
|
bos@88
|
175 \item[\texttt{date}] The date and time on which the changeset was
|
bos@88
|
176 created, and the timezone in which it was created. (Thef date and
|
bos@88
|
177 time are local to that timezone; they display what time and date it
|
bos@88
|
178 was for the person who created the changeset.)
|
bos@88
|
179 \item[\texttt{summary}] The first line of the text message that the
|
bos@88
|
180 creator of the changeset entered to describe the changeset.
|
bos@88
|
181 \end{itemize}
|
bos@88
|
182 The default output printed by \hgcmd{log} is purely a summary; it is
|
bos@88
|
183 missing a lot of detail.
|
bos@88
|
184
|
bos@96
|
185 \begin{figure}[ht]
|
bos@96
|
186 \centering
|
bos@96
|
187 \grafix{tour-history}
|
bos@96
|
188 \caption{Graphical history of the \dirname{hello} repository}
|
bos@96
|
189 \label{fig:tour:history}
|
bos@96
|
190 \end{figure}
|
bos@96
|
191
|
bos@88
|
192 \subsection{Changesets, revisions, and identification}
|
bos@88
|
193
|
bos@88
|
194 English being a notoriously sloppy language, we have a variety of
|
bos@88
|
195 terms that have the same meaning. If you are talking about Mercurial
|
bos@88
|
196 history with other people, you will find that the word ``changeset''
|
bos@88
|
197 is often compressed to ``change'' or ``cset'', and sometimes a
|
bos@88
|
198 changeset is referred to as a ``revision'' or a ``rev''.
|
bos@88
|
199
|
bos@88
|
200 While it doesn't matter what \emph{word} you use to refer to the
|
bos@88
|
201 concept of ``a~changeset'', the \emph{identifier} that you use to
|
bos@88
|
202 refer to ``a~\emph{specific} changeset'' is of great importance.
|
bos@88
|
203 Recall that the \texttt{changeset} field in the output from
|
bos@88
|
204 \hgcmd{log} identifies a changeset using both a number and a
|
bos@88
|
205 hexadecimal string. The number is \emph{only valid in that
|
bos@88
|
206 repository}, while the hex string is the \emph{permanent, unchanging
|
bos@88
|
207 identifier} that will always identify that changeset in every copy
|
bos@88
|
208 of the repository.
|
bos@88
|
209
|
bos@88
|
210 This distinction is important. If you send someone an email talking
|
bos@88
|
211 about ``revision~33'', there's a high likelihood that their
|
bos@88
|
212 revision~33 will \emph{not be the same} as yours. The reason for this
|
bos@88
|
213 is that a revision number depends on the order in which changes
|
bos@88
|
214 arrived in a repository, and there is no guarantee that the same
|
bos@88
|
215 changes will happen in the same order in different repositories.
|
bos@88
|
216 Three changes $a,b,c$ can easily appear in one repository as $0,1,2$,
|
bos@88
|
217 while in another as $1,0,2$.
|
bos@88
|
218
|
bos@88
|
219 Mercurial uses revision numbers purely as a convenient shorthand. If
|
bos@88
|
220 you need to discuss a changeset with someone, or make a record of a
|
bos@88
|
221 changeset for some other reason (for example, in a bug report), use
|
bos@88
|
222 the hexadecimal identifier.
|
bos@88
|
223
|
bos@88
|
224 \subsection{Viewing specific revisions}
|
bos@88
|
225
|
bos@88
|
226 To narrow the output of \hgcmd{log} down to a single revision, use the
|
bos@91
|
227 \hgopt{log}{-r} (or \hgopt{log}{--rev}) option. You can use either a
|
bos@91
|
228 revision number or a long-form changeset identifier, and you can
|
bos@91
|
229 provide as many revisions as you want. \interaction{tour.log-r}
|
bos@88
|
230
|
bos@88
|
231 If you want to see the history of several revisions without having to
|
bos@88
|
232 list each one, you can use \emph{range notation}; this lets you
|
bos@88
|
233 express the idea ``I want all revisions between $a$ and $b$,
|
bos@88
|
234 inclusive''.
|
bos@88
|
235 \interaction{tour.log.range}
|
bos@88
|
236 Mercurial also honours the order in which you specify revisions, so
|
bos@88
|
237 \hgcmdargs{log}{-r 2:4} prints $2,3,4$ while \hgcmdargs{log}{-r 4:2}
|
bos@88
|
238 prints $4,3,2$.
|
bos@88
|
239
|
bos@91
|
240 \subsection{More detailed information}
|
bos@91
|
241
|
bos@91
|
242 While the summary information printed by \hgcmd{log} is useful if you
|
bos@91
|
243 already know what you're looking for, you may need to see a complete
|
bos@91
|
244 description of the change, or a list of the files changed, if you're
|
bos@91
|
245 trying to decide whether a changeset is the one you're looking for.
|
bos@91
|
246 The \hgcmd{log} command's \hggopt{-v} (or \hggopt{--verbose})
|
bos@91
|
247 option gives you this extra detail.
|
bos@91
|
248 \interaction{tour.log-v}
|
bos@91
|
249
|
bos@91
|
250 If you want to see both the description and content of a change, add
|
bos@91
|
251 the \hgopt{log}{-p} (or \hgopt{log}{--patch}) option. This displays
|
bos@91
|
252 the content of a change as a \emph{unified diff} (if you've never seen
|
bos@91
|
253 a unified diff before, see section~\ref{sec:mq:patch} for an overview).
|
bos@91
|
254 \interaction{tour.log-vp}
|
bos@91
|
255
|
bos@91
|
256 \section{All about command options}
|
bos@91
|
257
|
bos@91
|
258 Let's take a brief break from exploring Mercurial commands to discuss
|
bos@91
|
259 a pattern in the way that they work; you may find this useful to keep
|
bos@91
|
260 in mind as we continiue our tour.
|
bos@91
|
261
|
bos@91
|
262 Mercurial has a consistent and straightforward approach to dealing
|
bos@91
|
263 with the options that you can pass to commands. It follows the
|
bos@91
|
264 conventions for options that are common to modern Linux and Unix
|
bos@91
|
265 systems.
|
bos@91
|
266 \begin{itemize}
|
bos@91
|
267 \item Every option has a long name. For example, as we've already
|
bos@91
|
268 seen, the \hgcmd{log} command accepts a \hgopt{log}{--rev} option.
|
bos@91
|
269 \item Most options have short names, too. Instead of
|
bos@91
|
270 \hgopt{log}{--rev}, we can use \hgopt{log}{-r}. (The reason that
|
bos@91
|
271 some options don't have short names is that the options in question
|
bos@91
|
272 are rarely used.)
|
bos@91
|
273 \item Long options start with two dashes (e.g.~\hgopt{log}{--rev}),
|
bos@91
|
274 while short options start with one (e.g.~\hgopt{log}{-r}).
|
bos@91
|
275 \item Option naming and usage is consistent across commands. For
|
bos@91
|
276 example, every command that lets you specify a changeset~ID or
|
bos@91
|
277 revision number accepts both \hgopt{log}{-r} and \hgopt{log}{--rev}
|
bos@91
|
278 arguments.
|
bos@91
|
279 \end{itemize}
|
bos@91
|
280 In the examples throughout this book, I use short options instead of
|
bos@91
|
281 long. This just reflects my own preference, so don't read anything
|
bos@91
|
282 significant into it.
|
bos@91
|
283
|
bos@91
|
284 Most commands that print output of some kind will print more output
|
bos@91
|
285 when passed a \hggopt{-v} (or \hggopt{--verbose}) option, and less
|
bos@91
|
286 when passed \hggopt{-q} (or \hggopt{--quiet}).
|
bos@91
|
287
|
bos@91
|
288 \section{Making and reviewing changes}
|
bos@91
|
289
|
bos@91
|
290 Now that we have a grasp of viewing history in Mercurial, let's take a
|
bos@91
|
291 look at making some changes and examining them.
|
bos@91
|
292
|
bos@91
|
293 The first thing we'll do is isolate our experiment in a repository of
|
bos@91
|
294 its own. We use the \hgcmd{clone} command, but we don't need to
|
bos@91
|
295 clone a copy of the remote repository. Since we already have a copy
|
bos@91
|
296 of it locally, we can just clone that instead. This is much faster
|
bos@91
|
297 than cloning over the network, and cloning a local repository uses
|
bos@91
|
298 less disk space in most cases, too.
|
bos@91
|
299 \interaction{tour.reclone}
|
bos@91
|
300 As an aside, it's often good practice to keep a ``pristine'' copy of a
|
bos@91
|
301 remote repository around, which you can then make temporary clones of
|
bos@91
|
302 to create sandboxes for each task you want to work on. This lets you
|
bos@91
|
303 work on multiple tasks in parallel, each isolated from the others
|
bos@91
|
304 until it's complete and you're ready to integrate it back. Because
|
bos@91
|
305 local clones are so cheap, there's almost no overhead to cloning and
|
bos@91
|
306 destroying repositories whenever you want.
|
bos@91
|
307
|
bos@91
|
308 In our \dirname{my-hello} repository, we have a file
|
bos@91
|
309 \filename{hello.c} that contains the classic ``hello, world'' program.
|
bos@91
|
310 Let's use the ancient and venerable \command{sed} command to edit this
|
bos@91
|
311 file so that it prints a second line of output. (I'm only using
|
bos@91
|
312 \command{sed} to do this because it's easy to write a scripted example
|
bos@91
|
313 this way. Since you're not under the same constraint, you probably
|
bos@91
|
314 won't want to use \command{sed}; simply use your preferred text editor to
|
bos@91
|
315 do the same thing.)
|
bos@91
|
316 \interaction{tour.sed}
|
bos@91
|
317
|
bos@91
|
318 Mercurial's \hgcmd{status} command will tell us what Mercurial knows
|
bos@91
|
319 about the files in the repository.
|
bos@91
|
320 \interaction{tour.status}
|
bos@91
|
321 The \hgcmd{status} command prints no output for some files, but a line
|
bos@91
|
322 starting with ``\texttt{M}'' for \filename{hello.c}. Unless you tell
|
bos@91
|
323 it to, \hgcmd{status} will not print any output for files that have
|
bos@91
|
324 not been modified.
|
bos@91
|
325
|
bos@91
|
326 The ``\texttt{M}'' indicates that Mercurial has noticed that we
|
bos@91
|
327 modified \filename{hello.c}. Notice that we didn't need to
|
bos@91
|
328 \emph{inform} Mercurial that we were going to modify the file before
|
bos@91
|
329 we started, or that we had modified the file after we were done; it
|
bos@91
|
330 was able to figure this out itself.
|
bos@91
|
331
|
bos@91
|
332 It's a little bit helpful to know that we've modified
|
bos@91
|
333 \filename{hello.c}, but we might prefer to know exactly \emph{what}
|
bos@91
|
334 changes we've made to it. To do this, we use the \hgcmd{diff}
|
bos@91
|
335 command.
|
bos@91
|
336 \interaction{tour.diff}
|
bos@91
|
337
|
bos@91
|
338 \section{Recording changes in a new changeset}
|
bos@91
|
339
|
bos@91
|
340 We can modify files, build and test our changes, and use
|
bos@91
|
341 \hgcmd{status} and \hgcmd{diff} to review our changes, until we're
|
bos@91
|
342 satisfied with what we've done and arrive at a natural stopping point
|
bos@91
|
343 where we want to record our work in a new changeset.
|
bos@91
|
344
|
bos@91
|
345 The \hgcmd{commit} command lets us create a new changeset; we'll
|
bos@91
|
346 usually refer to this as ``making a commit'' or ``committing''.
|
bos@91
|
347
|
bos@91
|
348 \subsection{Writing a commit message}
|
bos@91
|
349
|
bos@91
|
350 When we commit a change, Mercurial drops us into a text editor, to
|
bos@91
|
351 enter a message that will describe the modifications we've made in
|
bos@91
|
352 this changeset. This is called the \emph{commit message}. It will be
|
bos@91
|
353 a record for readers of what we did and why, and it will be printed by
|
bos@91
|
354 \hgcmd{log} after we've finished committing.
|
bos@91
|
355 \interaction{tour.commit}
|
bos@91
|
356
|
bos@91
|
357 The editor that the \hgcmd{commit} command drops us into will contain
|
bos@91
|
358 an empty line, followed by a number of lines starting with
|
bos@91
|
359 ``\texttt{HG:}''.
|
bos@91
|
360 \begin{codesample2}
|
bos@91
|
361 \emph{empty line}
|
bos@91
|
362 HG: changed hello.c
|
bos@91
|
363 \end{codesample2}
|
bos@91
|
364 Mercurial ignores the lines that start with ``\texttt{HG:}''; it uses
|
bos@91
|
365 them only to tell us which files it's recording changes to. Modifying
|
bos@91
|
366 or deleting these lines has no effect.
|
bos@91
|
367
|
bos@91
|
368 \subsection{Writing a good commit message}
|
bos@91
|
369
|
bos@91
|
370 Since \hgcmd{log} only prints the first line of a commit message by
|
bos@91
|
371 default, it's best to write a commit message whose first line stands
|
bos@91
|
372 alone. Here's a real example of a commit message that \emph{doesn't}
|
bos@91
|
373 follow this guideline, and hence has a summary that is not readable.
|
bos@91
|
374 \begin{codesample2}
|
bos@91
|
375 changeset: 73:584af0e231be
|
bos@91
|
376 user: Censored Person <censored.person@example.org>
|
bos@91
|
377 date: Tue Sep 26 21:37:07 2006 -0700
|
bos@91
|
378 summary: include buildmeister/commondefs. Add an exports and install
|
bos@91
|
379 \end{codesample2}
|
bos@91
|
380
|
bos@91
|
381 As far as the remainder of the contents of the commit message are
|
bos@91
|
382 concerned, there are no hard-and-fast rules. Mercurial itself doesn't
|
bos@91
|
383 interpret or care about the contents of the commit message, though
|
bos@91
|
384 your project may have policies that dictate a certain kind of
|
bos@91
|
385 formatting.
|
bos@91
|
386
|
bos@91
|
387 My personal preference is for short, but informative, commit messages
|
bos@91
|
388 that tell me something that I can't figure out with a quick glance at
|
bos@91
|
389 the output of \hgcmdargs{log}{--patch}.
|
bos@91
|
390
|
bos@91
|
391 \subsection{Aborting a commit}
|
bos@91
|
392
|
bos@91
|
393 If you decide that you don't want to commit while in the middle of
|
bos@91
|
394 editing a commit message, simply exit from your editor without saving
|
bos@91
|
395 the file that it's editing. This will cause nothing to happen to
|
bos@91
|
396 either the repository or the working directory.
|
bos@91
|
397
|
bos@91
|
398 If we run the \hgcmd{commit} command without any arguments, it records
|
bos@91
|
399 all of the changes we've made, as reported by \hgcmd{status} and
|
bos@91
|
400 \hgcmd{diff}.
|
bos@91
|
401
|
bos@91
|
402 \subsection{Admiring our new handywork}
|
bos@91
|
403
|
bos@91
|
404 Once we've finished the commit, we can use the \hgcmd{tip} command to
|
bos@91
|
405 display the changeset we just created. This command produces output
|
bos@91
|
406 that is identical to \hgcmd{log}, but it only displays the newest
|
bos@91
|
407 revision in the repository.
|
bos@91
|
408 \interaction{tour.tip}
|
bos@91
|
409 We refer to the newest revision in the repository as the tip revision,
|
bos@91
|
410 or simply the tip.
|
bos@91
|
411
|
bos@91
|
412 \section{Sharing changes}
|
bos@91
|
413
|
bos@91
|
414 We mentioned earlier that repositories in Mercurial are
|
bos@91
|
415 self-contained. This means that the changeset we just created exists
|
bos@91
|
416 only in our \dirname{my-hello} repository. Let's look at a few ways
|
bos@91
|
417 that we can propagate this change into other repositories.
|
bos@91
|
418
|
bos@91
|
419 \subsection{Pulling changes from another repository}
|
bos@91
|
420 \label{sec:tour:pull}
|
bos@91
|
421
|
bos@91
|
422 To get started, let's clone our original \dirname{hello} repository,
|
bos@91
|
423 which does not contain the change we just committed. We'll call our
|
bos@91
|
424 temporary repository \dirname{hello-pull}.
|
bos@91
|
425 \interaction{tour.clone-pull}
|
bos@91
|
426
|
bos@91
|
427 We'll use the \hgcmd{pull} command to bring changes from
|
bos@91
|
428 \dirname{my-hello} into \dirname{hello-pull}. However, blindly
|
bos@91
|
429 pulling unknown changes into a repository is a somewhat scary
|
bos@91
|
430 prospect. Mercurial provides the \hgcmd{incoming} command to tell us
|
bos@91
|
431 what changes the \hgcmd{pull} command \emph{would} pull into the
|
bos@91
|
432 repository, without actually pulling the changes in.
|
bos@91
|
433 \interaction{tour.incoming}
|
bos@91
|
434 (Of course, someone could cause more changesets to appear in the
|
bos@91
|
435 repository that we ran \hgcmd{incoming} in, before we get a chance to
|
bos@91
|
436 \hgcmd{pull} the changes, so that we could end up pulling changes that we
|
bos@91
|
437 didn't expect.)
|
bos@91
|
438
|
bos@91
|
439 Bringing changes into a repository is a simple matter of running the
|
bos@91
|
440 \hgcmd{pull} command, and telling it which repository to pull from.
|
bos@91
|
441 \interaction{tour.pull}
|
bos@91
|
442 As you can see from the before-and-after output of \hgcmd{tip}, we
|
bos@91
|
443 have successfully pulled changes into our repository. There remains
|
bos@92
|
444 one step before we can see these changes in the working directory.
|
bos@92
|
445
|
bos@92
|
446 \subsection{Updating the working directory}
|
bos@92
|
447
|
bos@92
|
448 We have so far glossed over the relationship between a repository and
|
bos@91
|
449 its working directory. The \hgcmd{pull} command that we ran in
|
bos@91
|
450 section~\ref{sec:tour:pull} brought changes into the repository, but
|
bos@91
|
451 if we check, there's no sign of those changes in the working
|
bos@91
|
452 directory. This is because \hgcmd{pull} does not (by default) touch
|
bos@91
|
453 the working directory. Instead, we use the \hgcmd{update} command to
|
bos@91
|
454 do this.
|
bos@91
|
455 \interaction{tour.update}
|
bos@91
|
456
|
bos@91
|
457 It might seem a bit strange that \hgcmd{pull} doesn't update the
|
bos@91
|
458 working directory automatically. There's actually a good reason for
|
bos@91
|
459 this: you can use \hgcmd{update} to update the working directory to
|
bos@91
|
460 the state it was in at \emph{any revision} in the history of the
|
bos@91
|
461 repository. If you had the working directory updated to an old
|
bos@91
|
462 revision---to hunt down the origin of a bug, say---and ran a
|
bos@91
|
463 \hgcmd{pull} which automatically updated the working directory to a
|
bos@91
|
464 new revision, you might not be terribly happy.
|
bos@91
|
465
|
bos@91
|
466 However, since pull-then-update is such a common thing to do,
|
bos@91
|
467 Mercurial lets you combine the two by passing the \hgopt{pull}{-u}
|
bos@91
|
468 option to \hgcmd{pull}.
|
bos@91
|
469 \begin{codesample2}
|
bos@91
|
470 hg pull -u
|
bos@91
|
471 \end{codesample2}
|
bos@92
|
472 If you look back at the output of \hgcmd{pull} in
|
bos@92
|
473 section~\ref{sec:tour:pull} when we ran it without \hgopt{pull}{-u},
|
bos@92
|
474 you can see that it printed a helpful reminder that we'd have to take
|
bos@92
|
475 an explicit step to update the working directory:
|
bos@92
|
476 \begin{codesample2}
|
bos@92
|
477 (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
|
bos@92
|
478 \end{codesample2}
|
bos@91
|
479
|
bos@91
|
480 To find out what revision the working directory is at, use the
|
bos@91
|
481 \hgcmd{parents} command.
|
bos@91
|
482 \interaction{tour.parents}
|
bos@91
|
483 To update the working directory to a particular revision, give a
|
bos@91
|
484 revision number or changeset~ID to the \hgcmd{update} command.
|
bos@91
|
485 \interaction{tour.older}
|
bos@91
|
486 If you omit an explicit revision, \hgcmd{update} will update to the
|
bos@94
|
487 tip revision, as shown by the second call to \hgcmd{update} in the
|
bos@94
|
488 example above.
|
bos@91
|
489
|
bos@92
|
490 \subsection{Pushing changes to another repository}
|
bos@92
|
491
|
bos@92
|
492 Mercurial lets us push changes to another repository, from the
|
bos@92
|
493 repository we're currently visiting. As with the example of
|
bos@92
|
494 \hgcmd{pull} above, we'll create a temporary repository to push our
|
bos@92
|
495 changes into.
|
bos@92
|
496 \interaction{tour.clone-push}
|
bos@92
|
497 The \hgcmd{outgoing} command tells us what changes would be pushed
|
bos@92
|
498 into another repository.
|
bos@92
|
499 \interaction{tour.outgoing}
|
bos@92
|
500 And the \hgcmd{push} command does the actual push.
|
bos@92
|
501 \interaction{tour.push}
|
bos@92
|
502 As with \hgcmd{pull}, the \hgcmd{push} command does not update the
|
bos@92
|
503 working directory in the repository that it's pushing changes into.
|
bos@92
|
504 (Unlike \hgcmd{pull}, \hgcmd{push} does not provide a \texttt{-u}
|
bos@92
|
505 option that updates the other repository's working directory.)
|
bos@92
|
506
|
bos@92
|
507 What happens if we try to pull or push changes and the receiving
|
bos@92
|
508 repository already has those changes? Nothing too exciting.
|
bos@92
|
509 \interaction{tour.push.nothing}
|
bos@92
|
510
|
bos@93
|
511 \subsection{Sharing changes over a network}
|
bos@93
|
512
|
bos@93
|
513 The commands we have covered in the previous few sections are not
|
bos@93
|
514 limited to working with local repositories. Each works in exactly the
|
bos@93
|
515 same fashion over a network connection; simply pass in a URL instead
|
bos@93
|
516 of a local path.
|
bos@93
|
517 \interaction{tour.outgoing.net}
|
bos@93
|
518 In this example, we can see what changes we could push to the remote
|
bos@93
|
519 repository, but the repository is understandably not set up to let
|
bos@93
|
520 anonymous users push to it.
|
bos@93
|
521 \interaction{tour.push.net}
|
bos@93
|
522
|
bos@84
|
523 %%% Local Variables:
|
bos@84
|
524 %%% mode: latex
|
bos@84
|
525 %%% TeX-master: "00book"
|
bos@84
|
526 %%% End:
|